2025-04-04T08:09:08.000Z

---

On what was termed 'Liberation Day,' U.S. President Donald Trump made a significant announcement regarding reciprocal tariffs that has since generated considerable confusion among observers and policymakers alike. The discrepancy between the charts displayed during Trump's Rose Garden presentation and the official annex released as part of the White House’s executive order has raised eyebrows, particularly concerning the tariff rates imposed on various economies.

The announcement included a controversial chart showing a 26% reciprocal tariff on India; however, the White House document released as an annex showed a 27% rate. This inconsistency was not limited to India and extended to at least 14 other economies, highlighting a broader issue of transparency and clarity in the administration's trade policy.

Initially, the annex specified tariff rates that were consistently one percentage point higher than those depicted in Trump's presentation. This prompted the White House to revise the annex on Thursday, lowering the rates to align with the 'discounted' tariffs Trump had outlined during his announcement. This revision process illustrates the complexities involved in the administration's tariff strategy and its implications for international trade relations.

According to the executive order, all U.S. trading partners were informed that starting from April 5, they would be subject to a universal 10% tariff. However, those countries specifically named in the annex would see their rates increase to predetermined levels just four days later. The confusion surrounding the exact rates has sparked discussions about the potential effects on economies and whether they have the resilience to withstand these changes.

The countries impacted by the revised tariff rates include India, South Korea, Botswana, Cameroon, Malawi, Nicaragua, Norway, Pakistan, the Philippines, Serbia, South Africa, Thailand, Vanuatu, and the Falkland Islands. For instance, while South Korea's rate fluctuated between 25% and 26%, it ultimately settled at 25%. The rate changes have left many economic analysts questioning the potential impact of these tariffs on both American consumers and the global market.

A White House official has confirmed that the rates specified in the revised annex would indeed be enforced, which adds a layer of urgency for affected nations to respond to these new tariffs. Notably, several overseas territories that were initially mentioned in Trump's charts, displaying distinct tariff rates from their parent nations, were absent from the annex entirely. For example, Reunion, a French territory located in the Indian Ocean, was initially set for a 37% tariff but was subsequently omitted from the formal document. Similarly, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, along with Norfolk Island, were also excluded, even as their respective parent nations, France and Australia, face different tariff rates of 20% and 10%, respectively, as members of the EU and bilateral trade agreements.

This ongoing situation raises questions about the transparency of trade policy under the Trump administration and its potential implications for U.S. relations with key global partners. The confusion surrounding the tariff rates not only complicates trade agreements but also presents challenges for businesses trying to navigate the new landscape. As the situation evolves, it is imperative for stakeholders—both domestic and international—to stay informed and engaged as they work to adapt to these new trade realities.