2025-04-03T09:00:02Z

This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now.

The race for artificial intelligence (AI) talent has intensified to such an extent that Google has resorted to offering some employees a paid one-year leave instead of allowing them to join competing firms. This revelation comes from a group of four former employees of Google DeepMind in the UK, who, wishing to remain anonymous due to company policies, shared key insights about the company\'s handling of talent retention through noncompete agreements.

Noncompete agreements are legal contracts that restrict employees from taking jobs with competitors for a specified period after leaving their current employer. These agreements have become a powerful tool for tech companies like Google as they navigate the competitive landscape of AI innovation, which continues to accelerate as firms rapidly roll out cutting-edge products and technologies.

Employees at Google DeepMind who are bound by these noncompete clauses have been placed on extended "garden leave." During this period, while they remain on the payroll, they are effectively sidelined from their work at DeepMind. The duration of these noncompete agreements tends to vary based on several factors, including an employee\'s seniority and the critical nature of their contributions to the company.

According to the accounts shared by the former DeepMind staffers, the standard length for many noncompete clauses is around six months. This is particularly true for individual contributors involved in the development of Google\'s Gemini AI models. However, more senior researchers may face even longer restrictions, with some noncompetes stretching to a full year.

A spokesperson for Google defended the company\'s practices, stating, \\"Our employment contracts are in line with market standards. Given the sensitive nature of our work, we use noncompetes selectively to protect our legitimate interests.\\" This statement underscores the company\'s stance that such agreements are necessary to safeguard its innovations and proprietary technologies.

Despite Google\'s assurances, many employees at DeepMind have voiced concerns about how these lengthy noncompete clauses limit their career mobility, especially in an era characterized by a burgeoning AI industry. One former employee poignantly remarked, \\"Who wants to sign you for starting in a year? That\'s forever in AI.\\" The rapidly changing landscape of AI makes a six-month wait feel like an eternity, particularly when new startups and opportunities emerge daily.

In the United States, the enforceability of noncompete agreements varies significantly from state to state. Notably, California, home to Google and several other tech giants, does not enforce noncompete clauses, a law further strengthened by new legislation in 2023 that prevents enforcement of such agreements entered into outside the state. Conversely, in the UK, where DeepMind is based, noncompete clauses are enforceable as long as they are deemed reasonable to protect legitimate business interests.

This situation presents a considerable challenge for talent at one of the world’s leading AI laboratories, especially as competitors like OpenAI and Microsoft expand their operations in the UK and actively seek to recruit DeepMind employees. The pressure to remain competitive in such a dynamic field has led some DeepMind personnel to consider relocation to areas like California, where they could escape the constraints of their noncompete agreements.

The situation came to a head last week when Nando de Freitas, vice president of Microsoft AI and a former director at DeepMind, publicly addressed the issue. He shared on X (formerly Twitter) that he frequently receives messages from DeepMind employees expressing their distress over their notice periods and noncompete agreements. He urged those feeling trapped to reach out to DeepMind leadership, including CTO Koray Kavukcuoglu and senior research director Douglas Eck, who he claimed are against the practice.

“Above all don’t sign these contracts,” de Freitas warned in his post. “No American corporation should have that much power, especially in Europe. It’s abuse of power, which does not justify any end.” His comments have sparked considerable discourse among tech professionals about the ethical implications of such agreements.

As the AI talent wars rage on, the perspective on noncompete agreements has shifted dramatically. In the past, many employees viewed receiving full pay during a prolonged notice period as a favorable situation. However, with numerous enticing opportunities emerging in the fast-paced AI sector, this sentiment is changing. One former DeepMind employee explained, “It’s becoming less popular now because there are loads of cool startups that wouldn’t be willing to wait six months-plus, so people end up missing out on some good opportunities.” This sentiment reflects a broader trend in the industry, highlighting the evolving landscape of employee rights and corporate control.

In conclusion, the ongoing battle for AI talent and the contentious issue of noncompete agreements at Google DeepMind reveal a significant dilemma faced by employees in the sector. As the AI industry continues to flourish, the implications of these restrictive contracts may redefine how talent moves within tech and ultimately shape the future of innovation.