Loading Articles!

Prince Harry Takes Legal Action to Restore His Security Detail in the UK

Sergei Ivanov
Sergei Ivanov
"It's about time he stood up for his rights! #PrivacyMatters"
Robert Schmidt
Robert Schmidt
"Will the media ever learn to respect his privacy?"
Robert Schmidt
Robert Schmidt
"Does he really think he can win this battle?"
Carlos Mendes
Carlos Mendes
"Sad to see how much he has to fight for basic security."
Aisha Al-Farsi
Aisha Al-Farsi
"What will happen if the court sides with him?"
Lian Chen
Lian Chen
"Good luck to him! He deserves to feel safe."
Derrick Williams
Derrick Williams
"Why can't he just hire his own security team?"
Nguyen Minh
Nguyen Minh
"This is getting ridiculous; how much more can he take?"
Emily Carter
Emily Carter
"The tabloids really need to back off! #LeaveHarryAlone"
Jessica Tan
Jessica Tan
"I can't believe they denied him private funding."
Zanele Dlamini
Zanele Dlamini
"This is turning into a royal reality show, isn't it?"
Sofia Mendes
Sofia Mendes
"Can we just let Harry live his life in peace for once?"

2025-04-08T05:58:30.000Z


LONDON -- Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is preparing to challenge a recent decision made by the U.K. government regarding his security arrangements, seeking to have his publicly funded security detail reinstated. This legal battle highlights ongoing tensions between the royal family and the media, as well as the challenges faced by Harry and his family since stepping back from royal duties.

After stepping down from his official role as a working member of the royal family in February 2020 and relocating to the United States, Harry lost his government-funded protection. His decision to detach from royal responsibilities raised questions about his safety and the subsequent risks he faces when visiting his home country.

To contest the previous ruling made by a High Court judge, Harry's legal team is set to appear before the Court of Appeal in London. The High Court had previously upheld a government panel’s decision, which allowed for a “bespoke” security arrangement for Harry on an as-needed basis, asserting that this decision was neither unlawful nor unjustified.

Harry has voiced concerns about the risks he and his family face while in the U.K., citing a growing climate of hostility directed toward him and his wife, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex. He claims that social media vitriol and relentless coverage by the press have created a dangerous environment, particularly when they return to Britain.

At 40 years old, Prince Harry, the younger son of King Charles III, has challenged royal traditions by taking legal action against both the government and the tabloid press. His previous legal endeavors have yielded mixed results. In one case, he sought permission to privately finance a police security detail during his visits to the U.K., but that request was denied by a judge who ruled that police resources should not be allocated for the protection of wealthy individuals.

Furthermore, he dropped a libel case against the Daily Mail’s publisher, which alleged that he had attempted to conceal his efforts for continued government-funded protection. However, in a notable victory earlier this year, Harry won a significant trial against the Daily Mirror’s publisher, with the judge acknowledging that phone tapping within the tabloid was “widespread and habitual.” This case culminated in an unprecedented apology from Rupert Murdoch’s U.K. tabloids, which admitted to years of invasive practices and agreed to pay substantial damages to Harry.

Currently, Harry has another legal action pending against the Mail's publisher, suggesting that his battle for privacy and security is far from over. The outcome of these legal proceedings could have major implications not only for Harry and his family but also for the broader issues surrounding privacy rights and media conduct in the U.K.

Profile Image Elena Petrova

Source of the news:   abcnews.go.com

BANNER

    This is a advertising space.

BANNER

This is a advertising space.