2025-09-01T13:58:43Z

---

Imagine a world where a nuclear reactor powers human settlements on the moon! And guess what? The U.S. is gearing up to make that a reality by 2030. Yes, you heard it right. NASA has officially announced plans to install a nuclear reactor on the moon, a milestone that could revolutionize space exploration and human presence beyond Earth.

This ambitious initiative comes at a time when competition in space exploration is heating up, with nations like China and Russia also racing to establish their own nuclear infrastructures on the lunar surface. For scientists, having a reliable energy source on the moon is crucial for creating sustainable human habitats for future missions to Mars and ongoing scientific research.

“The NASA announcement of a lunar reactor by 2030 is a welcome step,” said Bhavya Lal, former associate administrator for technology, policy, and strategy at NASA. “For decades, we have lacked exactly this kind of clear, deadline-driven target. It is especially encouraging that the directive focuses on power because without abundant, sustained power, everything else in space is temporary.”

But why is nuclear power essential for the moon? Traditional solar energy has its limitations; the moon experiences a 28-day rotation cycle that includes 14 Earth days of darkness. This means that solar panels would only provide power half the time, making them unreliable for long-term energy needs. In contrast, a nuclear reactor could continuously supply the energy necessary to keep astronauts and equipment functioning even during the lunar night.

Experts like Simeon Barber from The Open University explain, “Solar panels only generate power when the sun is shining. On the moon, the night-time lasts for around 14 Earth days, so another energy source is needed to keep equipment – and astronauts – warm and safe through the lunar night.” British volcanologist Lionel Wilson further emphasizes this point, stating, “You get 14 days of free electricity if you have lots of solar panels. But then you get 14 days of no sunlight, and if anything goes wrong with storage systems, you get very cold, very fast.”

Most experts believe this groundbreaking reactor will likely be installed near the moon’s south pole, a region thought to be rich in water ice. Barber notes the significance of this area, as the ice could be used for drinking water or transformed into hydrogen and oxygen to create a fuel station for rockets destined for Mars.

However, the task isn't without challenges. While the south pole area may receive more sunlight, rough terrain and shadows from craters could still hinder energy collection. As Wilson points out, “batteries and a nuclear backup system are still needed.”

The U.S. isn’t the only player in this new space race. In May, China and Russia jointly announced plans to build an automated nuclear power station on the moon by 2035 as part of their International Lunar Research Station project. With rising geopolitical tensions, experts warn that such advances could lead to competitive claims of control over lunar regions, with NASA's acting head Sean Duffy cautioning that these countries could declare “keep-out zones” around their installations.

Of course, the idea of launching nuclear material into space brings its own set of concerns. Barber acknowledges the risks, especially if a launch were to fail. Yet he reassures that the quantities of fuel involved are relatively modest, hence manageable. “Reactor designs go to great lengths to minimize risk,” Wilson adds, pointing out that small nuclear power sources are already in use on spacecraft venturing to the far reaches of our solar system.

However, skeptics argue that the U.S. has a rocky history with space nuclear initiatives. The last operational fission reactor in space was the SNAP-10A satellite reactor in 1965, and many future projects faced cancellation after consuming billions. But Lal remains optimistic, suggesting that success in this endeavor requires the same level of government commitment as the historic Manhattan Project.

“The Manhattan Project’s first test was driven by adequate funding, empowered leadership, and a sense of strategic urgency,” she says. “Those same conditions must underpin space nuclear efforts today.” The program is estimated to require between $2 billion to $3 billion in the first five years, along with investments in fuel infrastructure, safety protocols, and regulatory reforms.

So, as we stand on the brink of a new era in space exploration, the question remains: Can the U.S. deliver on this ambitious promise of a nuclear reactor on the moon? One thing is for sure, the journey to lunar energy independence is just beginning!